When Losing Is Actually Winning
The following are some of the most common reasons why people lose:
1) They do not have enough time to prepare their strategy.
2) They did not take into account all possible scenarios.
3) Their opponent was better than they thought.
4) They were too impatient and gave up before they could win.
5) Their opponents played with a different style from what they expected.
(e.g. playing passively)
6) They didn’t think through their moves carefully enough.
7) They made a mistake during the game.
When Losing Is Actually Winning
In order to win, it is necessary to have the right mindset and make the correct decisions at every turn. There are many ways to achieve victory. For example, if your opponent plays defensively and waits for you to make a move, then you will probably lose. If however, your opponent plays aggressively and attacks immediately when he sees that you are making a mistake, then you will definitely win. You must learn how to play according to the situation.
There are two types of players: those who play according to the rules and those who don’t. The first type is the one we described above. They are always predictable and never break any rules. You should be the second type and play by your own rules.
Even if you’re playing by the rules, you must still do so cleverly. You must play the game in a way that your opponent doesn’t expect. It is always better to trick your opponents instead of using brute force. This is easier to do if you have a deeper understanding of the rules.
If you can trick your opponents, they will break the rules themselves. At this point, it is legal to take advantage of any mistakes they make because they are actually breaking the rules of the game. It is still possible to win by playing fairly, but you must know the rules inside and out. If you know them better than your opponent, then you have an advantage. Even if your opponent plays completely fairly though, you can still win if you have a better understanding of the rules.
If you can convince your opponent that the rules are on your side even though they aren’t really, then you will have an even greater advantage than knowing the actual rules. This strategy is frowned upon by most players because it involves lying but it is very effective. Convincing someone that black is white is a lot easier than convincing them that yellow is green.
If you can convince your opponent that you are playing by the rules when in reality you are not, then you have achieved victory. This is the most difficult strategy of all because you must be very clever to trick your opponent in this way. If you are successful in doing this, then you will win regardless of how good your opponent is.
Some people believe that this is a mark of a sociopath because they are willing to lie and cheat. This may be true, but this approach has helped many people win. It is all a matter of opinion though; there are many people who don’t approve of this strategy and there are many people who do. One thing is certain, if you are going to use these techniques, you must do so cleverly or it will backfire on you and make you lose.
(Visited 6,904 times, 1 visits today)
Sources & references used in this article:
Can losing lead to winning? by J Berger, D Pope – Management Science, 2011 – pubsonline.informs.org
Winning, losing and political trust in America by CJ Anderson, AJ LoTempio – British Journal of Political Science, 2002 – JSTOR
Winning through losing by D NeJaime – Iowa L. Rev., 2010 – HeinOnline
Salivary cortisol changes in humans after winning or losing a dominance contest depend on implicit power motivation by MM Wirth, KM Welsh, OC Schultheiss – Hormones and behavior, 2006 – Elsevier
Do the Haves Come out Ahead-Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970 by S Wheeler, B Cartwright, RA Kagan, LM Friedman – Law & Soc’y Rev., 1987 – HeinOnline
A discourse on winning and losing by J Boyd – 2018 – airuniversity.af.edu
Can a near win kindle motivation? The impact of nearly winning on motivation for unrelated rewards by M Wadhwa, JHC Kim – Psychological science, 2015 – journals.sagepub.com